Santa Monica Boulevard Reconstruction: Change is Coming to Beverly Hills!
You may know Santa Monica Boulevard as one of the busiest crosstown streets on the Westside. Fifty thousand vehicles traverse it daily. No fewer than four Metro buses serve it. And it is a critical segment of a regional ‘backbone’ bicycle network connecting Beverly Hills to the cities of Santa Monica, West Hollywood and Los Angeles. This boulevard is the road that gets many of us where we’re going regardless of our choice of travel mode. But today’s Santa Monica Boulevard in Beverly Hills is engineered primarily for motoring. Today it is best experienced behind the wheel of a motorcar. It wasn’t ways so, however; Santa Monica had been a multimodal corridor long before auto uses predominated.
Now we have an chance to make this 1.8 mile section of Santa Monica Boulevard in Beverly Hills friendly again to those who choose not to get behind the wheel. Our design consultant, Psomas, says this is a “once in a lifetime opportunity to re-imagine it.” We agree. We all must work together to ensure that at its conclusion in 2015 we have a ‘complete streets’ corridor.
About the Santa Monica Boulevard Reconstruction Project
What is it? This
$16 $35 million Santa Monica Boulevard project will reconstruct the boulevard between West Hollywood to Century City. The redesign is expected to retain four vehicular travel lanes (accommodating 55,000 cars on average daily according to traffic counts).
How might the corridor change? The most significant change could be that we make this corridor safe for all who use it (regardless of mode). City Council directed the project team to consider complete streets principles, which should mean improved crosswalks, re-engineered intersections and perhaps Class II bicycle lanes in addition to a landscaped median and left-turn lanes.
When will this project commence? It’s already underway. We are well into the first of three project phases – discussion about design alternatives – and next the city will undertake engineering with phase III construction to follow in 2015. See the city’s project page for construction mitigation information (as it’s posted). Find all the documents you’ll need our project documents library (below).
Where We Are Now: Public Outreach Phase I
City Council in September created a Santa Monica Boulevard Blue Ribbon Committee of 15 appointed residents to receive public input. The committee was charged with receiving public input, discussing conceptual designs, and making recommendations to Council. By the time the committee wrapped up in late January, 50 people had provided public comment and another 150 more commented. Over 90% supported bicycle lanes. You can read our meeting recaps and make your position known to City Council before the next meeting on April 1st.
About Those Bicycle Lanes
Consultant Psomas has developed design alternatives and possible ‘enhancements’ which include a landscaped median and dual Class II bicycle lanes. We’d like to see both a median and bicycle lanes. We’d prefer not to see tomorrow’s boulevard look like what we have today.
The first question is whether or not we will expand the boulevard to accommodate the median, turn lanes, and bicycle lanes. Because the boulevard is irregular in width today (ranging from about 60-63 feet wide), expansion would standardize it to one of these proposed widths: 63, 64 or 66 feet. Additional width would allow for a shorter construction period and reduce project costs, our consultant says; widths over 64 feet, they say, will accommodate class II lanes. Should the boulevard be standardized at the widest width today (63 feet), it would take only twelve inches more to accommodate bicycle lanes. (At left we see the full 66-foot option staked out by the consultant.)
Bicycle lane proponents say the lanes are necessary in order to ensure the safety of those who choose to ride a bicycle. They note that Santa Monica Boulevard is a regional ‘backbone’ bike route, so would the city reconstruct our segment of the corridor as an obstacle to multimodal mobility? They also add that both West Hollywood and City of Los Angeles bookend the city with their own class II lanes.
Critics, notably two resident associations, Beverly Hills North Homeowner Association and the Municipal League, have positioned themselves as defenders of the park, claiming that Beverly Hills is park poor. They’ve circulated to city households all manner of falsehoods via call-to-action and a newsletter and ‘town hall’ event scheduled for June 26th at 7pm.
Santa Monica Boulevard has a distinguished history of facilitating multimodal transportation. Why not continue that legacy into the 21st century? The Blue-Ribbon committee thought so an voted 9-1 to stripe bicycle lanes if we expand the boulevard. Helpfully our neighboring cities frame the choice: West Hollywood remade their segment of the corridor into an award-winning, pedestrian-friendly Main Street, one characterized by wide sidewalks and safe crosswalks. Los Angeles turned their West LA segment into a limited access freeway. But both include on-street lanes.
The last City Council meeting saw council divided; given uncertainties about costs, the Council declined to take any decision on the project at the March 4th meeting and has deferred action to the July 1st City Council meeting. Then Council may well decide to limit the new width to preclude lanes, or perhaps take some other action on the project.
Here you will find the relevant project documents and supporting material that you won’t find on the city’s own project page. Let’s start with our own meeting recaps (and related posts) and then work down to documents that suggest the policy and history contexts for this project.
Our Project Meeting Recaps
- November 7th Blue-Ribbon Committee meeting recap
- Santa Monica Boulevard Tour #1 Recap
- December 10th Blue-Ribbon Committee meeting recap
- January 8th Blue-Ribbon Committee meeting recap
- January 22nd Blue-Ribbon Committee meeting recap
- March 4th City Council meeting recap
Our Santa Monica Boulevard Reconstruction project-related posts
- Another dozen reasons!
- A dozen reasons why bicycle lanes are right for Santa Monica Boulevard
- Beverly Hills Calls for Public Input on SM Blvd Project (10/28/13)
- Council’s Agenda for Tuesday: SM Blvd Reconstruction (9/6/13)
- Council Hears Santa Monica Boulevard Options (9/11/13)
- Beverly Hills Community Survey: Where’s the Validity?
- Will Complete Streets Become the Law of the Land? (8/4/13)
- City Releases Draft SM Blvd. Reconstruction RFP (4/16/12)
- City Council Study Session: Complete Streets Mentioned (4/7/12)
- What We Can Do Today About Santa Monica Boulevard
City Project Documents
- City’s DRAFT request for proposals for Santa Monica Boulevard (4/17/12)
- City’s request for proposals for Santa Monica Boulevard (1/24/13)
- Psomas Santa Monica Blvd proposal
- Santa Monica Boulevard project goals PowerPoint (9/10/13)
- Meeting #1 agenda November 7, 2013
- Meeting #1 city’s minutes
- Meeting #2 agenda December 10, 2013
- Meeting #2 city’s minutes
- Meeting #3 agenda January 8, 2014
- Psomas meeting #3 Memo
- Psomas meeting #3 Memo attachment
- Committee meeting #3 city’s minutes (not distributed)
- Meeting #4 agenda January 22, 2014
- Psomas meeting #4 memo
- Psomas meeting #4 memo exhibits
City Staff Reports
- Santa Monica Boulevard reconstruction cost staff report (5/20/14)
- Santa Monica Blvd Reconstruction staff report (4/1/14)
- Santa Monica Blvd Reconstruction staff report (3/8/14)
- Santa Monica Blue Ribbon Committee recommendations staff report (3/8/14)
- Santa Monica Boulevard Blue Ribbon Committee Formation staff report (10/15/13)
- Psomas contract staff report (6/4/13)
- Public Outreach Options staff report (9/10/13)
- Santa Monica Blvd Reconstruction staff report (9/21/10)
- Public Outreach Options staff report (9/1013)
- General Plan Circulation Element (2010)
- Bicycle Master Plan (1977)
- Vision 2025 sustainability report (2003)
- Sustainable City Plan (2009)
- General Plan white paper: Santa Monica Boulevard Corridor (No. 3, March 2006)
- LACBC proposal for Santa Monica Blvd bicycle lanes (2009)
- Santa Monica Boulevard Blue-Ribbon Committee Roster
- Aaron Kunz, Director of Transportation (Beverly Hills)
- Susan Healey Keene, Director of Community Development (Beverly Hills)
- Michael Meyer, transportation planner (Iteris)
- Sean Vargas, Project Principle (Psomas)
- Jeff Chess, Senior Project Manager (Psomas)
Santa Monica Boulevard’s Multimodal Mobility History
Let’s briefly look back at the history of Santa Monica Boulevard to understand how it moved Angelenos for the past century.
Most recently this was State Highway 2, and long before Beverly Hills took control in 2005 the corridor languished under the state’s DOT. Quick patches sufficed for maintenance and potholes proliferated. Perhaps most dangerous for those of us who ride a bicycle, the storm grates and potholes pose regular collision hazards. City stewardship has proven no better, however.
Prior to its ignominy today, Santa Monica Boulevard was once the terminal segment of the famous Route 66 that linked Chicago to Santa Monica. All that remains of the old road in Beverly Hills are a few commemorative signs, but there is a movement afoot to memorialize the history.
Long before Route 66, however, the corridor served the Pacific Electric’s Western Division streetcar lines. Our city thrived as the junction of two lines that anchored Beverly Hills into the Southern California rail network. The station occupied the northwest corner of Crescent & Little Santa Monica, across from City Hall. When the post office was constructed there, the station moved a block west between Beverly and Canon (seen here from Santa Monica North looking southwest).
These streetcars moved two million passengers annually through Beverly Hills before passenger service was stopped in the early 1950s!
Even prior to the regular service of those two Pacific Electric streetcar lines, the predecessor rail corporation, Los Angeles Pacific, ran a ‘balloon’ excursion train (“four double tracks to the Pacific Ocean”) through what was then called ‘Morocco Junction’ (as depicted in the map to the right) but known today as Beverly Hills.
But our Santa Monica Boulevard betrays none of that distinguished history today. Policymakers should approach this project as a “once in a lifetime” opportunity to honor this rich multimodal mobility history. Remember, multimodal mobility is not just an historical footnote for this corridor; it will be our future too.