About Our Safe Streets Campaign

Congestion on Santa Monica Boulevard

Our Campaign for Better Transportation Choices

bike jump

Beverly Hills: Rollin’ like it’s 1977!

Better Bike is all about making our streets safe and accessible for all travelers. Since 2010 we have pressed City of Beverly Hills to leave behind our outdated transportation thinking to join our Westside city neighbors in supporting multimodal mobility. We can start by making travel by bike a  safe and practical alternative to traveling by car. After all, that’s exactly what our plans say we need to do!

Today, traveling by bike or on foot means risking injury. Riders and walkers are the most vulnerable road users, of course, and over the past decade in Beverly Hills the number of road users injured in crashes has increased 50%. (See our handy chart.) That means our choice to walk or ride a bicycle, as urged by our Sustainable City Plan, carries a greater risk of injury than ever.

Our roads must be made safe for all road users. We look forward to a complete streets plan one day that will make that obligation explicit to city officials.

The First Step to Safer Streets: A Real Plan

Multimodal mobility is the best solution to problems like increased congestion and greenhouse gas emissions. Indeed our General Plan’s Circulation Element talks about making streets safe for all road users. But that’s just talk if no policy supports it and no program implemented to make it real to road users. We know from experience that bicycle lanes not only make cyclists safer, they make cyclists feel safe too.

Since 2010 Better Bike has called for the creation of a bike plan and the implementation of programs to make cycling safe. We’ve asked for dedicated bike lanes, intersection improvements, safety signage, and bike parking – all measures that we see in other cities – and all pretty much dismissed out-of-hand for Beverly Hills. “We’re not Santa Monica,” we’ve heard our councilmembers say many times. “We’re not West Hollywood.”

We don’t have to be any other city to keep our residents safe regardless of their mode of travel. And it’s not rocket science. At a minimum Beverly Hills should designate a citywide bicycle network. It could look something like this:

Bike routes Bevery Hills proposed map

A citywide bike route network would supplement a few blocks of Burton Way lanes with protected lanes on Santa Monica Boulevard and Charleville (east-west) while Beverly and Crescent offer safe (north-south) travel to Culver City and beyond.

Our streets should incorporate these measures to make the safe for cycling:

  • Class II bike lanes on key corridors;
  • Signage throughout the city alerting road users to the presence of riders; and,
  • Intersections designed for cyclist safety, which may include bike boxes, dedicated signals, and appropriate pavement markings.

Getting From Here to There

Eight years ago our Traffic & Parking Commission created an ad-hoc Bike Plan Update committee to bring our 1977-era Bicycle Master Plan into the modern era. That committee never met nor made any recommendations to City Council. A more heartening sign came in 2016 when City Council agreed to make a priority of safer streets, including an update of the 1977 Bicycle Master Plan. Our City Council is more bike-friendly than ever today.

Now Beverly Hills is undertaking a complete streets planning process. That is both a necessity (the state’s Complete Streets Act, signed into law in September of 2008, requires local complete streets plans) and a prudent move (Metro grant funding is contingent on a certified complete streets plan).


These are all reasons for optimism after a very long delay in embracing what other cities already have: safe streets to encourage safe mobility regardless of mode choice. By calling attention to the opportunities for safe cycling in Beverly Hills, and calling out our city’s poor progress on street safety, Better Bike hopes to suggest a path forward. Have you any suggestions to offer? Let us know.

Recent Posts

Complete Streets Comes to Beverly Hills

Those of us waiting for Beverly Hills to update its Bicycle Master Plan may soon have cause to celebrate. On this, the 40th anniversary of the plan, which was adopted in 1977, the city appears poised to give it a refresh – and more! Rather than simply update the bike plan, the city will undertake a complete streets planning process.

The change in direction was announced in the spring with an information update to our Traffic and Parking Commission.

The Traffic and Parking Commission has been contemplating a Bicycle Master Plan update since 2010 and even once had organized an ad-hoc committee to do it. Ultimately the committee was tasked with installing bicycle racks (just 42 installed to date!). So the plan that was penned at the crest of the bicycle renaissance of the 1970s was left to age as an appendix in the city’s master plan. Instead the commission focused on the regulation of parking permits, valets, and taxicabs. (Fun fact: onetime chair of the commission, Lester Friedman, is now a sitting Beverly Hills councilmember.)

This complete streets effort traces its genesis to the City Council’s designation of a new mobility plan as an A-level priority in January of 2016. That initiative was spearheaded by current Mayor Lili Bosse, who remains the most vocal supporter of pro-bike improvements and safe streets on our City Council. Bosse had pushed that priority to the top of the city’s priority-setting exercise options list and then persuaded then-councilmember Willie Brien to get on board too. (Councilmember John Mirisch, who knows a complete street when he sees one, was already in favor.)

(Who did not step up for safe streets? Our current Vice Mayor Julian Gold. Like Brien he is a physician, and has presumably seen more than his share of two-wheeled crash victims, but he couldn’t make safe streets his priority.)

Then when Lili Bosse took the Mayor’s chair this past March, she quickly acted on that A-list priority and moved the one issue dearest to riders atop of the City Council agenda: striping Santa Monica Boulevard for bicycle lanes. In June Council unanimously agreed to stripe Class II lanes and even decided to make them high-visibility!

That was the most tangible sign of the city’s commitment to safe streets that I’ve seen in the seven years I’ve been hounding City Hall for it.

So, Beverly Hills complete streets planning process is soon to kick off. But why did it take so many years after surrounding cities adopted their own complete streets plans? After all, West Hollywood Culver City, Santa Monica and Los Angeles each adopted plans in 2011 or earlier; (West Hollywood and Santa Monica are now embarking on a round-2 updates.)

The roots go back even further to AB 1538, the California Complete Streets Act, which the legislature passed and the governor signed in 2008:

Commencing January 1, 2011, upon any substantial revision of the circulation element, the legislative body shall modify the circulation element to plan for a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of the streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel in a manner that is suitable to the rural, suburban, or urban context of the general plan.

That same year, California DOT released a directive titled, ‘Complete Streets: Integrating the Transportation System.’ The intent was to “provide for the needs of travelers of all ages and abilities” and to direct localities to ensure “opportunities to improve safety, access, and mobility for all travelers” across all modes. The directive recognized bicycle, pedestrian, and transit as “integral elements of the transportation system” and by mandated ‘complete streets’ principles be incorporated early, from  planning through delivery.

It was a good time for complete streets but Beverly Hills wasn’t buying. The state’s Complete Streets Act was in place when Beverly Hills adopted its current General Plan and mobility element. The Act even required our city to include complete streets in it!  But we put it off to the law’s deadline… which is now.

But there was an even more pressing reason we’re on board with complete streets right now. Metro requires a ‘certified’ complete streets plan of every locality as a condition of disbursing grant money for Metro-funded transportation projects. Beverly Hills had one.

Remember, Metro has a BIG pot of money, and Beverly Hills wants its piece. So, now we’re embracing complete streets! But we’re in body if not in spirit: our complete streets request-for-proposals (RFP) says almost nothing about the reason any locality should incorporate complete streets principles into plans: SAFETY!

What’s next in the complete streets plan process? Well, our complete streets RFP went out to bidders in June and eight proposals were received by July 1st. City Council is due to review them in September. But before it does, we want to be sure we get a look at those proposals so that we are prepared to comment.

First, we understand, the proposals will be vetted by a committee including the chairs of the Planning Commission and the Traffic and Parking Commission. That’s good for us! Both chairs (Gordon and Seidel) are excellent commissioners, and Seidel himself is a rider.

Next the proposals go to the Traffic and Parking liaison committee. Not so great for us. Gold sits on that committee, as does former TPC commissioner and current councilmember Les Friedman. Neither has exhibited much enthusiasm historically for complete streets. However the liaison is a public meeting and we will want to be prepared to address the merits of the plans.

One of the risks of the RFP process was that collective ambition for a complete streets plan could be scoped down and our imagination attenuated – leaving us with a weak plan and poor prospects for implementation. That is always a possibility. Thankfully Lili Bosse will remain our Mayor until March, when – we hope – the framework of the plan is established.

Until then, a handful of us have been at it since the draft RFP was released in the spring. And we will be there to see it through to City Council. That will be the ultimate test of the city’s commitment to safer streets and we will be there watching.

Santa Monica bicycle lanes, after all, was a great victory for mobility in Beverly Hills, but it was simply a down-payment on an overdue tab: safe streets for those who walk, ride and drive in Beverly Hills. We’d like to see that debt paid with interest!

  1. Bike With Beverly Hills Mayor Lili Bosse This Sunday! Comments Off on Bike With Beverly Hills Mayor Lili Bosse This Sunday!
  2. Beverly Hills City Council UNANIMOUSLY OKs SM Blvd Bike Lanes 8 Replies
  3. Santa Monica Boulevard Bicycle Lanes Come Back to Council 1 Reply
  4. Back on the Priority List: The Beverly Hills Bike Plan! Comments Off on Back on the Priority List: The Beverly Hills Bike Plan!