About Us

About Better Bike

Mark Elliot headshotMark Elliot is a Beverly Hills resident and cyclist who created Better Bike in early 2010 to spark a conversation about road safety and how to make city streets welcoming to those who choose to ride a bicycle. After a couple of near-misses on our streets underscored the perils of riding in Beverly Hills, Mark made himself a fixture at city meetings to make the change happen.

 

Educated as a city planner, Mark knows that our policies must change if they are to reflect the noble rhetoric about encouraging non-motor mobility we find in our city plans. He wants to hear from you about your experience riding the streets of Beverly Hills.

Keeping Up with Better Bike

RSS Recap our recent posts by signing up for our bi-weekly email digest. Check out our latest posts via RSS. (Read more about RSS feeds.) And of course follow Better Bike on Twitter.

Recent Posts

File Under ‘Crap Facilities': Dangerous Crescent Dr. Sharrows

City of Beverly Hills was warned many months ago about this improper placement of sharrows on Crescent Drive:

Crescent Drive sharrows placement

Is this any way to make our streets safer for those who choose to ride a bicycle?

As explicated in this graphic, these sharrows guide northbound Crescent riders into the left-hand lane, which allows motor traffic to pass on the right. After the South Santa Monica intersection, however, riders are then guided back to the right-hand lane which requires a merge back into faster-flowing traffic. This remains an eye-catching road engineering #FAIL six months after we notified the city about it.

Crescent Drive is a well-traveled N/S street that finds northbound motorists rushing to make the stoplights at North and South Santa Monica boulevards. So putting riders literally in the middle of this scrum is at best a mistake and, more likely, is a result of professional incompetence or ignorance.

While the misplacement of a sharrow marking may seem trivial to a driver, this state-approved traffic control device is important to riders as it offers official guidance as to where to ride. It is intended to make roads safer for those who ride a bicycle, not put them in harm’s way.

What is a Sharrow?

According to the state’s Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), sharrows can be used to:

Assist bicyclists with lateral positioning in lanes that are too narrow for a motor vehicle and a bicycle to travel side by side within the same traffic lane; alert road users of the lateral location bicyclists are likely to occupy within the traveled way; and encourage safe passing of bicyclists by motorists…. (MUTCD Section 9C.07 Shared Lane Marking)

sharrow markingAccording to the manual, the marking “shall only be used on a roadway which has on-street parallel parking.” But Crescent northbound here has no parallel parking, of course. And even if it did, the MUTCD offers this bit of specific guidance: Where used to direct riders to a lane adjacent to a traffic lane, it should be only to the left of a right-turn-only lane. (Section 4D.104 Bicycle Signals).

As the manual suggests, it is better to use no sharrows at all than to implement unsafe sharrows.

We’ve Tried and Tried to Get This Fixed

I first contacted the Beverly Hills Deputy Director for Transportation Aaron Kunz in early June after noticing the unsafe sharrows placement:

Sharrows on Crescent (south of little SM) make an ill-advised jog around a non-turn lane as I recall (not the best practice).

Then I suggested that our city fix it. After seeing no action, though, I followed up in early August:

I’ve been puzzled by the hazardous placement of n/b Crescent sharrows. I wonder if the city has a plan to fix it?

Kunz acknowledged the problem and said a fix was in the works. But no fix came. So I followed up again in early October:

Can you remind me if the city will be fixing the sharrow alignment problem on Crescent at SM South? (We spoke about it in early August.)

Kunz replied, “I will check on the status of moving the sharrow as we discussed and get a date.” Hearing nothing back about it (of course) I then followed up a third time in late October:

I’m wondering if you’ve been able to nail down the date?

Aaron replied, “The moving of the sharrow will be a priority but unfortunately I do not have a date yet.” Optimistically I said I would look forward to having the problem corrected.

But evidently I was too optimistic! Here we are approaching February and there is no fix yet. Where in the transportation planner’s handbook does it say that a mistake like this can go unaddressed despite highlighting the problem and following up three times? It cries out for a lawsuit!

  1. Beverly Hills Should Take the Foxx US DOT Challenge Leave a reply
  2. TPC Commissioner Alan Gruschow Passes Leave a reply
  3. Bike Share for Beverly Hills? Leave a reply
  4. Recapping the Recappers: How Local Media Covered SM Blvd 1 Reply
  5. News Flash! City Council Keeps Bike Lanes on the Table 5 Replies
  6. LA Councilman’s Hostility Toward Complete Streets Sounds Familiar 14 Replies
  7. Passing Safely: It’s the Law! 1 Reply
  8. Political Accountability Takes a Holiday in Beverly Hills 1 Reply
  9. Santa Monica Boulevard Meetup This Monday Comments Off
  10. City Council Punts: Bike Lanes Deferred Again [Recap] Comments Off
  11. Death Blow to SM Blvd Lanes Likely Tomorrow 7 Replies
  12. Are Fading Beverly Hills Bike Facilities a Metaphor? Comments Off
  13. CicLAvia October, 2014 in Pictures Comments Off